Analytics Catalog/Oracle Fusion ERP/Receivables/Bad Debt Provision Report
Explore the catalogReportsModulesEnterprise modelOTBI subject areasBICC PVOs
Seeded report · Accounting

Bad Debt Provision Report

Receivables◆ Seeded · Accounting

Estimates bad-debt exposure by applying each customer's percent-collectible to their open balance, listing transaction number, balance due, and the calculated provision amount in the ledger currency.

Sample build of the Bad Debt Provision Report — reconciled, and rendered tool-neutral so it runs in Power BI, ThoughtSpot, or Tableau.

Bad Debt Provision Report
Sample build · illustrative
Filters
Period
FEB-26
Ledger
US Primary
Currency
USD
$24.00M
Open AR
$1.20M
Bad-debt provision
48
Customers > 90d
CustomerOpen Balance% CollectibleProvisionAged > 90Status
Acme Industrial$1,240,500.00SampleSampleSampleOpen
Northwind Trading$842,150.75Posted
Globex Holdings$96,400.00SampleSampleSampleValidated
Initech LLC$1,005,233.10Open
Umbrella Corp$58,720.40SampleSampleSamplePaid
Acme Industrial$1,240,500.00SampleSampleSampleOpen
AI Analyst · active
reading

The report applies each customer's percent-collectible to their open balance to estimate the bad-debt provision.

flag

$1.2M of provision is concentrated in a handful of customers aged past 90 days — collection risk is clustered, not spread.

root cause & next step

Prioritize collection on the concentrated accounts; a provision driven by a few names is a targeted-collection problem, not a portfolio one.

Illustrative data. The live interactive version — drill-through, filters, export, and the AI Analyst — runs on your warehouse. See it live →

This is the report's BI Publisher data model — the SQL data set BI Publisher runs against Oracle tables to produce the output. The same SQL becomes a dbt model in your warehouse, so one definition drives both the formatted report and the analytics layer.

Data sources

How it interconnects: this data set reads the physical tables above. Those same tables surface in OTBI as subject areas and in BICC as PVOs — three lenses on one source. Open any table to trace its subject areas and View Objects.
The SQL data set is authored to this report's exact spec during the build and ships as the BI Publisher data model plus a matching dbt model — one definition, both layers.

The data-warehouse model — one fact surrounded by conformed dimensions (what you slice by) and measures (what you aggregate), expressed as dbt so it migrates with you. Grain: one row per source transaction.

AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALLdimensionHZ_CUST_ACCOUNTSdimensionHZ_PARTIESdimensionRA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALLfact · one row per source transactionOpen Balance
●— fact → dimension join
ElementTypeDefinition
AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALLdimensiondimension
HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTSdimensiondimension
HZ_PARTIESdimensiondimension
Open Balancemeasuremeasure
Runs on your cloud warehouse — Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, or Synapse on AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, or any provider. Reconciled to the source control total — 0% variance by design. You own the code, the model, and the data.
How the data gets here: a BICC bulk extract of the source tables above, on the same pattern for every report. See the extraction pattern & data flow →
See the complete model
How this report's fact and dimensions fit the full picture, via conformed keys.
Receivables data model →Enterprise model →

Every source object behind this report. Each linked table has its own page with full column descriptions, drawn from the Oracle BICC lineage and articulated for practitioners.

TableReporting columnsSubject areas
RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL5816
AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALL326
HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS1443
HZ_PARTIES81144
Reporting columns = fields the report selects that are exposed as analytics attributes; subject areas = the OTBI subject areas the table appears in. Setup and configuration tables (master data, ledger and book setup, lookups) are referenced by the report's joins but aren't exposed as analytics columns or subject areas — that's expected, not a gap.

Customization note  The percent-collectible model is coarse; most teams replace it with an aging-based or expected-credit-loss calculation that feeds the allowance journal. Irvine rebuilds these on your data.