The merit pool, spent and unspent
Six hundred thousand was approved. 577,080.00 went out. 22,920.00 never left. The budget report shows each department’s pool, spend, and remainder on one line, so the cycle closes with arithmetic instead of an argument.
◆ Pool, spend, remainderone line per department, closed to the cent.
| Department | Approved pool | Spend | Remaining | Used % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 260,000.00 | 249,600.00 | 10,400.00 | 96.0 |
| Technology Delivery | 210,000.00 | 201,600.00 | 8,400.00 | 96.0 |
| Support | 130,000.00 | 125,880.00 | 4,120.00 | 96.8 |
| All departments | 600,000.00 | 577,080.00 | 22,920.00 | 96.2 |
Every row closes: pool minus spend equals remaining, and the spend column is the same 577,080.00 annual cost the cycle report states. The 22,920.00 left over is now a named decision: return it, roll it, or fund the off-cycle cases. Sample values are illustrative, never client data.
◆ Why the remainder mattersunspent money is unanswered questions.
A pool underspent by four percent usually means a handful of awards were planned and never entered, or a department held reserve for a case that resolved late. Both are worth a name. The remainder is where next quarter’s off-cycle adjustments quietly come from, and a report that shows it keeps that spend visible instead of folkloric.
◆ The owned answerbudget beside events, reconciled by query.
The pool is a small reference table; the spend is the sum of merit events per department. The reconciliation is one join, rerun whenever an event backdates into the cycle.
The compensation star carries the facts and dimensions this page assumes; the report adds only a grouping and a division.
- merit pool
- The approved budget for cycle increases, per department.
- spend
- The summed annual value of awarded increases.
- remainder
- Pool minus spend; a decision, not dust.
- utilization
- Spend over pool, quoted after the money is summed.
- off-cycle adjustment
- An increase outside the cycle, often funded by remainders.