Analytics Catalog/Workday/Talent/Ratings vs outcomes
Explore the catalogModulesTalentRating distributionTurnover calculationMovement
Workday · Talent · Editorial

What the ratings predicted

Every cycle produces ratings, filed and forgotten. The question nobody answers is whether they predicted anything: who left, who advanced. Follow the rated cohort forward, and the answer is a join the delivered per-cycle reports never make.

RuleFollow the rating cohort forward: join it to the turnover and promotion of the next twelve months, per worker, and read the outcome rates by band.
Neverjudge ratings by their distribution alone. The shape hides the regretted attrition, the top-rated who left, which only the forward join reveals.
Rated cohort 296, at the cycle Twelve months followed forward Outcome stayed, left, or promoted
A rating is only a prediction until the cohort is followed forward. The delivered report stops at the cycle; the join carries it to the outcome.
Ratings, filed and forgottenthe cycle ends, the join never happens.

Every cycle produces a distribution, and there it stops. The delivered reports keep ratings per cycle, with no path forward to what happened next. So the question a leadership team actually has, did these ratings predict anything, who left, who advanced, has no report, because the answer is a join between this cycle’s ratings and the following year’s outcomes.

The distribution shows the shape. This page carries that same cohort forward, into the turnover and promotion the turnover and movement models already track.

The cohort, followed forwardby rating, who left and who was promoted.
RatingCohortLeft in 12moPromoted in 12mo
5, exceptional1818
4, exceeds92622
3, meets1511412
2, developing2970
1, below630
Total, the rated cohort2963142

The ratings did predict. Attrition climbs as the rating falls, from 6 percent at the top to half the ones, and promotion concentrates at the top, 44 percent of the fives.

But the join shows what the distribution hides: seven of the thirty-one who left were rated four or five, the regretted attrition a shape never surfaces and a manager most needs to see. The cohort ties to the same 296 the distribution counts. Sample values are illustrative, never client data.

The owned answerthe cohort join, and the question becomes a query.

Join the rating cohort to the movement and turnover events in the twelve months after the cycle, per worker. Outcome rates by band fall out; regretted attrition is the top-rated leavers; promotion validity is whether the fives actually advanced. The longitudinal question the delivered per-cycle report cannot reach becomes one grouping in a model that keeps every cycle.

-- outcomes by rating band, the cohort followed 12 months forward
SELECT r.rating_value,
       COUNT(*)                                          AS cohort,
       SUM(CASE WHEN o.event = 'termination' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS left_12mo,
       SUM(CASE WHEN o.event = 'promotion'   THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS promoted_12mo
FROM fct_rating r
LEFT JOIN fct_worker_event o
  ON o.worker_key = r.worker_key
  AND o.event_date BETWEEN r.cycle_end AND r.cycle_end + INTERVAL '12' MONTH
WHERE r.cycle_code = '2026-MY'
GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 1 DESC

Run it each cycle and the reviews stop being filed and forgotten. They become a prediction with a track record, and calibration gains the one thing it never had: evidence that the ratings meant something.

Use case
Problem
Ratings are kept per cycle with no forward join, so whether they predict turnover or promotion, and which top performers were lost, goes unanswered.
What we build
A cohort join carrying each cycle’s ratings forward to the turnover and promotion events of the following year, per worker.
What you get
Outcome rates by rating band, regretted attrition surfaced, and calibration with evidence that the ratings meant something.
Did your last cycle’s ratings predict who left, and who you lost?
We join the cohort forward and show what the ratings were worth.
Talk to us
Terms on this page
HR
Human resources. Core HR holds the turnover and movement this joins to.
rating cohort
The set of workers rated in one cycle, followed forward as a group.
longitudinal
Tracking the same cohort across time rather than one snapshot.
turnover
Workers leaving; here, measured in the year after the rating.
promotion
A worker advancing; here, a movement type tracked forward.
regretted attrition
A high-rated worker leaving: the loss that matters most.
outcome rate
The share of a rating band reaching an outcome, left or promoted.
calibration
The review of ratings, here gaining evidence they predict.